My Take...
Playoffs? PLAYOFFS? Are You KIDDING ME?
This season, 2013-14 marks the
final year of the BCS.
The BCS has been in place since the 1998 season
as the consensus method of determining the MNC
(Mythical National Champion). Prior to the 2006 season eight teams competed in four BCS Bowls.
The BCS replaced the Bowl Alliance which was the
"system" in place from 1995–1997. Prior to that we
had something called the Bowl Coalition from 1992–1994.
Prior to the Bowl Coalition's
creation in 1992, the AP Poll's #1 and #2 teams met
in a bowl game only 8 times in 56 seasons. Since the
creation of the BCS in 1998 the AP's #1 and #2 teams
met 12 of 15 seasons.
All of these rankings - especially during the BCS
era - had generated controversy and Oregon was
involved in a couple of these discussions.
Most notably in 2001 when Nebraska was voted in to
play Miami over Oregon.
On June 26, 2012, it was
announced that the Bowl Championship Series will be
replaced by a four-team playoff, effective for the
2014–15 season, to be called the College Football
Playoff.
A good, quick review of the history, as
written by Richard Billingsley, can be found HERE.
"Few things have been more controversial in sports than the National Championship in college football. Over the years the
cries of "We're No. 1" have rang far and wide, from the Golden Dome to the Tiger Den, from the Coliseum to the Swamp,
from Death Valley to Happy Valley and everywhere in between...."
-- Richard Billingsley
What are the chances that there will be no controversy in 2014? Right. It
won't be around the cry of "We're #1!" so much as "We're #4!" ...
In 1994 the Pac10 and Big 10 had
not yet succumbed to the pressure of playoff and
more money. They still had their highly-valued and
deeply traditional connection to "The Granddaddy of
Them All".
Immediately following that 1994
season and before Oregon's appearance in the Rose
Bowl, I had become inspired ... and convinced we
needed to move to a more realistic way of "crowning"
a TRUE national champion in college football. So
much so that I composed my plan and delivered it to
a couple radio stations in Eugene, Or. and Seattle, Wa. for their review.
This is a redux of that
commentary.....
5 December 1994
To: KJRB; KUGN
Gentlemen --
|
Put me down as a traditionalist -
one that would like the bowl system to remain the
way it is. But recognizing the inevitable -
that $$ pressures will force a playoff if public
demand can't; I think I have come up with the best
solution. Keep in mind several prerequisites ...
- ALL moneys generated by the three-game
playoffs to go into a pool to be divided
EVENLY between all Division 1 schools
- Give players a monthly stipend up to $200 / month (WORK/study$) |
- Develop a more realistic poll system - one like the Sagarin Computer -
that would include such things as opponents'
combined records, etc.
- Create a BLUE RIBBON panel (like NCAA roundball) for picking coalition
teams.
- No plan will work without the PAC 10 / Big 10 in the
coalition
- PRESERVE THE BOWL
SYSTEM!! as much as possible |
With these caveats in mind - what
follows is THE DEFINITIVE DIVISION 1 FOOTBALL
PLAYOFF PLAN! GO DUCKS!!!!!!!! |
DIVISION 1 FOOTBALL PLAYOFF PROPOSAL
The seven major conferences
plus the highest placing major independent each
will play in designated bowl games against
seeded coalition teams.
The winners of these
bowl games - played on New Year's Day - will
enter a seeded 8-team playoff on the last three
weekends in January; with 1 playing 8, 2 vs. 7,
3 vs. 6, and 4 vs. 5. Playoff seeding to happen
following completion of the January 1 games. |
|
Pac 10 Champ in the Rose Bowl; Big 10 Champ in
the Fiesta; Big 12 Champ in the Cotton; SEC
Champ in the Sugar; WAC Champ in the Holiday;
ACC Champ in the Peach; Big East Champ in the
Orange; Highest placing Independent in the
Citrus. |
Each of these teams to play a coalition
team as determined by the Blue Ribbon
Panel. If you have a fairly
designed poll then the conference champ
highest in the poll would play the
lowest seeded coalition team on New
Year's Day, etc. |
IF THE SYSTEM WERE IN PLACE
THIS YEAR THEN THE FOLLOWING MATCHUPS WOULD TAKE
PLACE JANUARY 1 (Using the final 1994 Sagarin
Computer Ratings - below in parenthesis; Winners
are in Bold)
Rose Bowl |
Fiesta Bowl |
Cotton Bowl |
Oregon(11) v Ohio
St(8) |
Penn St(1) v
Utah(16)* |
Nebraska(2) v Kansas
St(15)* |
Sugar Bowl |
Holiday Bowl |
Peach Bowl |
Florida(4) v USC(13) |
Colorado St(18) v
Alabama(7) |
Florida St(3) v
Michigan(14) |
Orange Bowl |
Citrus Bowl |
|
Miami(5) v
Tennessee(12) |
Notre Dame(19) v
Colorado(6) |
|
* Auburn
and Texas A&M would replace Utah and
Kansas St in the plan if they were not
currently on probation. |
Playoff Bowl sites would then
rotate between either the above sites or possibly
others such as the Astrodome, Kingdome, LA Coliseum,
etc. or perhaps those existing bowl sites that were
not selected above could be used. The January
1 winners would continue as the "home" team at the
above sites ...
This would work best if ALL
conferences went to the SEC plan and have 12 teams
with a Conference Championship game. Teams would play
each team in their division plus 3 games from the
other division in their conference and 3
intersectional games.
Leave it to the "experts" to work
out the details!! This will work -- Let's get on
with it!
-- Randy Stewart, QuackerBacker
In November of 2010, Austin Murphy and
Dan Wetzel (co-author of "Death to the BCS")
wrote an article in Sports Illustrated highlighting
the problems with the BCS system.
In the article, they pointed out several inequities
in and corruption of the system; noting
that a preliminary investigation by Congress was
being encouraged, for example, by Boise St. |
|
Also in 2010 it came to light through an exhaustive
internal report that "Fiesta Bowl CEO John Junker’s
payola scheme that lavished his cronies with cash
and graft and golf" would later lead to his
removal.
This all helped add to the momentum for change. The
issue may not be fully resolved but we are moving in
the right direction... Oh. And by the way? Only the
Oregon-Auburn game was at all interesting during the
BCS Championship Game Era [Evidence
HERE]. Other candidates would certainly
be Ohio St-Miami and USC-Texas. |
Eight teams in a playoff seems about right
to me. Placing strong emphasis on Conference
Champions and strength of schedule - including OOC
(out of conference) games. This, then, would
not devalue the regular season. |
So the BCS is dead. R.I.P.
POST SCRIPT
n 2001, Jim Mora issued what will remain
forever as one of the greatest melt-down
press conference comments of all time.
|
|
"Well, I’ll start off by saying this: do not blame that game on the defense, OK?
I don’t care who you play — whether it’s a high school team, a junior college team, a college team — much less an NFL team.
When you turn the ball over five times — four interceptions, one for a touchdown, three others in field position to set up touchdowns —
you ain’t going to beat anybody I just talked about. Anybody. All right?
And that was a disgraceful performance in my
opinion. We threw that game. We gave it away
by doing that. We gave them the friggin’
game.
|
In my opinion, that sucked. Ah. You know?
You can’t turn the ball over five times like that. Holy crap! I don’t know who the hell we think we are when we do something like that.
Unbelievable. Five turnovers. One of them for — We’ve thrown four interceptions for touchdowns this year. That might be an NFL record!
And we’ve still got six games left, so there’s no telling how many we’ll have. That’s pitiful! I mean, it’s absolutely pitiful to perform
like that. Pitiful!" |
What’s that? Ah — Playoffs? Don’t talk about — playoffs? You kidding me? Playoffs?
I just hope we can win a game! Another game.
... and for a slightly DIFFERENT SLANT:
Yes. Let's go win another game ...
(UPDATE: The victory over Texas in the Valero Alamo
Bowl was sweet.)
Go Ducks
|